The proposed bill on the accelerated law submitted by deputy Nima Afram, which aims to exclude all municipalities from debts related to the solid waste management process, which resulted in the treasury, was sent to parliamentary commissions for further research.
There are a number of questions about the bill, for example, why did it not raise the urgency of the MP? The proposed law is the result of difficulties and perhaps the impossibility of translating the Law on Waste Management from the 80th Law on Integrated Waste, which was published since 10/10/2018. Years that envisage adopting decentralized solutions to address the worsening of the waste crisis in all regions and to enable municipalities to fulfill their responsibilities under this law. It is necessary to prepare local CSM programs within a maximum of three months from the day of adopting a national strategy for this integrated management.
Due to the lack of material resources for the implementation of this law and avoiding the decline of the crisis, it is in danger, and in anticipation of the ban in May, when the law on dosing of landfill in Bury Hamm, the bill is proposed.
What triggered further questions was to point to an accelerated law-commission, despite the fact that everyone knows that the Law no. 80, approved by the House of Representatives, Afram proposed a law that makes the application of the first possible and real. How can municipalities fulfill their obligations under the law in light of the lack of financial imports and are currently limited to municipal fees?
But what about the revenues of the Independent Municipal Fund, asking the "Republic"? "There are several municipalities that do not have much income due to the 20-year contract with Sukin and others, which prevents them from disposing of their money because they depend on their children for years, because the municipal fund was and still pays 160 dollars. About 40 percent in cash and 60 percent in waste, while waste treatment was possible at $ 14, such as Zahle.
Scandal of age
Afram, who explained the law and its positive reasons during the legislative session of November 12th, already sent it personally to all deputies. "Millions of dollars are now being paid to municipalities in Lebanon, for example, the Zouk in Kesrouan, with $ 34 million, the Yita municipality with $ 3 million, and new amounts of $ 30, $ 40 and $ 50 million, and injustice and injustice against a large segment of Lebanese of the citizens, knowing that the state paid the full commitment to companies that were contracted for solid waste management.
But the debt burden to municipalities has remained under the control of the state, as if the state punishes municipalities, and the silence of the House of Representatives! Municipalities can not enter into a new law on waste that passed a month ago, providing creative, fast and creative solutions in three months. Such solutions are much cheaper than $ 160.
The more they think about the withdrawal, the more pressure they face and tell them that you are first forced to pay off debts before you leave the central solutions, and this is a scandal in the era. "
"I do not think that parliamentary committees will have to study something, and that will be long before the law is adopted, and again we will fall into a big problem from the beginning of spring. If these debts are not canceled, the cost will be higher for the state, which will Municipalities reduce large amounts of money to waste treatment in a way that everyone knows is expensive and environmentally, because municipalities will not be able to deal with decentralized ways. Where is wisdom in referring the bill to further study in commissions?
He added: the question now lies in the competence of public opinion and municipalities.
The article expresses the opinion of the author, and not necessarily the site's policy[ad_2]